128 judgments found.

Osman v. United Kingdom

Country: United Kingdom
Year: 1998
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Citation: Application No. 23452/94; (1998) 29 EHRR 245; [1998] ECHR 101
Health Topics: Mental health, Public safety
Human Rights: Right to due process/fair trial, Right to family life, Right to life
Facts:

The applicants are Mrs. Mulkiye Osman and her son Ahmet Osman. Mr. Ali Osman, the husband and father of the applicants, respectively, was shot dead by Mr. Paul Paget-Lewis on 7 March 1988. Mr. Paget-Lewis was a former instructor of Ahmet Osman and had developed a strong attachment to him. Ahmet Osman was also wounded …Read more

Tags: Duty of care, Mental disorder, Mental illness, Negligence, Tort
Download Judgment: English French Romanian

Mrs. Shantha vs. State Of Andhra Pradesh and Ors

Country: India
Year: 1997
Court: High Court - Andhra Pradesh
Citation: 1999 ACJ 454; AIR 1998 AP 51; 1997 (4) ALT 357
Health Topics: Medical malpractice, Poverty
Human Rights: Right to health, Right to life
Facts:

Mrs. Shantha, the Petitioner, was admitted to the Government Maternity Hospital for a caesarian section. She was affected sterilization after the caesarian section. On leaving the hospital after the operation, she felt abdominal discomfort leading to very severe pain. Following medical examination, it was discovered that surgical equipment had been left inside the Petitioner’s abdomen …Read more

Tags: Inadequate treatment, Inappropriate treatment, Indigent, Low income, Negligence, Poor, Underprivileged
Download Judgment: English

Lowns v. Woods; Procopis v. Woods

Country: Australia
Year: 1996
Court: Supreme Court of New South Wales
Citation: [1996] Aust Torts Reports 81
Health Topics: Child and adolescent health, Chronic and noncommunicable diseases, Health care and health services, Health information, Medical malpractice, Medicines
Facts:

The plaintiff is the father of a child who suffered from seizures and who received brain damage due to a particular seizure. During that particular seizure, the mother had sent another child to call the local doctor, one of the defendants, who did not come. As New Zealand imposes a statutory duty on doctors to …Read more

Tags: Access to drugs, Access to medicines, Access to treatment, Compensation, Damages, Duty of care, Emergency care, Inadequate treatment, Minor, Negligence, Neurological diseases, Pediatric health, Remedies, Standard of care, Tort
Download Judgment: English

CES and Anr. v. Superclinics and Ors.

Country: Australia
Year: 1995
Court: Supreme Court of New South Wales
Citation: (1995) 38 NSWLR 47; (1995) Aust Torts Reports 81-360
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Hospitals, Medical malpractice, Mental health, Sexual and reproductive health
Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity
Facts:

CES (‘the first appellant’) sought damages from Superclinics (‘respondent’) for the loss of an opportunity to terminate her pregnancy. The first appellant, a 21-year-old woman, visited a doctor at Superclinics after she missed her period. She stated that if she were found to be pregnant, she would like the pregnancy terminated. The doctor did not …Read more

Tags: Abortion, Abortion counseling, Childbirth, Compensation, Counseling, Criminalization, Damages, Depression, Diagnostics, Duty of care, Examination, Family planning, Health care professionals, Health care workers, Late-term abortion, Maternal health, Misdiagnosis, Negligence, Pregnancy, Remedies, Termination of pregnancy, Testing, Therapeutic abortion, Tort
Download Judgment: English

Diennet v. France

Country: France
Year: 1995
Court: The European Court of Human Rights
Citation: Case number 25/1994/4/472/553
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Hospitals, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Right to due process/fair trial
Facts:

The Regional Council of Medical Association struck the applicant off the register of practitioners on account of professional misconduct such as not examining the patients personally and not monitoring or adjusting the treatment. On appeal, the National Council modified the Regional Council’s order of striking off to disqualifying him from practicing medicine for three years. …Read more

Tags: Clinics, Duty of care, Examination, Inadequate treatment, Inappropriate treatment, Negligence, Standard of care
Download Judgment: English

Kobe ter Neuzen v. Korn

Country: Canada
Year: 1995
Court: Supreme Court
Citation: [1995] 3 S.C.R. 674, [1995] S.C.J. No. 79
Health Topics: HIV/AIDS, Infectious diseases, Medical malpractice, Sexual and reproductive health
Facts:

The plaintiff was infected with HIV through an artificial insemination (“AI”) procedure performed by the defendant physician in 1985, before the various methods of HIV transmission were widely known. The physician performed 35 AI procedures on the plaintiff between 1981 and January 1985. The physician did not warn the plaintiff about the possibility of HIV …Read more

Tags: Assisted reproductive technology, Compensation, Damages, Duty of care, HIV, HIV positive, In utero fertilization, Negligence, Non-pecuniary damage, People living with HIV/AIDS, PLHIV, Remedies, Sexually transmitted diseases, Sexually transmitted infections, Standard of care, STDs, STIs, Tort, Transmission
Download Judgment: English French

McCourt v. Abernathy

Country: United States
Year: 1995
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Citation: McCourt v. Abernathy 457 S.E. 2d 603 (S.C. 1995)
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Right to health
Facts:

Respondent, Steven McCourt, as representative of his wife, Wendy McCourt, brought wrongful death and survival causes of action against appellant physicians, Glenn Abertnathy and J.D. Clyde and Family Medicine Associates. Decedent Wendy McCourt sought treatment from appellants in December 1987. Dr. Abernathy obtained a history from Wendy revealing a history of liver problems. In March …Read more

Tags: Compensation, Damages, Diagnostics, Duty of care, Emergency care, Examination, Inadequate treatment, Misdiagnosis, Negligence, Primary care, Standard of care, Testing, Tort
Download Judgment:

Rogers v. Whitaker 

Country: Australia
Year: 1992
Court: High Court
Citation: (1992) 175 CLR 479; [1992] HCA 58
Health Topics: Disabilities, Informed consent, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Right of access to information, Right to bodily integrity
Facts:

Appellant doctor appealed an award of $808,564.38 to respondent patient. Appellant doctor had operated on the right eye of respondent patient in an attempt to improve its appearance and restore some sight as respondent patient’s right eye had been sightless from a previous injury. The lower court had found that appellant doctor had operated with …Read more

Tags: Blind, Disabled, Duty of care, Handicapped, Informed choice, Negligence, Patient choice, Physically challenged, Standard of care, Tort
Download Judgment: English

X v. France

Country: France
Year: 1992
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Citation: App. No. 18020/91, 14 Eur. H.R. Rep. 483 (1992).
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Health systems and financing, HIV/AIDS, Infectious diseases, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Right of access to information, Right to due process/fair trial
Facts:

The applicant was given a number of blood transfusions and was found to have been infected with the AIDS virus. He alleged that he had been infected a result negligent delay of the Minister for Solidarity, Health and Social Protection in implementing appropriate rules for the supply of blood products. After having made unsuccessful efforts …Read more

Tags: AIDS, Blood transfusion, Compensation, Damages, HIV, HIV positive, HIV status, Negligence, People living with HIV/AIDS, PLHIV, Remedies, Sexually transmitted diseases, Sexually transmitted infections, Smallpox, STDs, STIs, Transmission
Download Judgment: English French Romanian Russian

K.H. v. Malmöhus Läns Landstingskommun

Country: Sweden
Year: 1990
Court: Supreme Court
Citation: NJA 1990 s 442 – Målnummer No. 40
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Health information, Hospitals, Informed consent, Medical malpractice
Facts:

Kerstin H. had an operation intended to lessen pain in her hip, however after the operation she still suffered from the original ailment as well as new pain. Prior to the operation, Kerstin H. had been informed that the doctors aimed “to clean up the area around the nerve” (the doctors had also used such …Read more

Tags: Clinics, Disclosure, Duty of care, Examination, Health care professionals, Informed choice, Negligence, Patient choice, Tertiary care, Unauthorized treatment
Download Judgment: English Swedish