Ximenes-Lopes v. Brazil
Country: BrazilYear: 2002
Court: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Citation: Report No. 38/02, Petition 12.237, October 9, 2002; OEA/Ser.L/V/II.117 Doc. 1 rev. 1, 7 March 2003
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Medical malpractice, Mental health
Human Rights: Freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, Right to due process/fair trial, Right to life, Right to privacy
Mr. Damião Ximenes Lopes was admitted to Casa de Repouso on October 1st, 1999 to receive treatment for his mental illness. When his mother, Mrs. Albertina Ximenes, went to visit him three days later, Mr. Lopes had his hands bound behind his back. He was bruised, his head was swollen, his nose bloody, and he …Read more
Case 00-14564
Country: FranceYear: 2001
Court: Cour de cassation [Court of Cassation]
Citation: Cass. civ I, n°00-14564, 9 October 2001
Health Topics: Child and adolescent health, Disabilities, Health care and health services, Health information, Informed consent, Medical malpractice, Sexual and reproductive health
Human Rights: Right of access to information, Right to health
A doctor, Y, was treating Mrs. X during her pregnancy. Y suspected a breech presentation (buttocks- or feet-first presentation rather than the normal head-first presentation) during the 8th month of pregnancy. The mother wanted a home birth. On 12 January, the child was born in a home birth and as a result of inadequate medical …Read more
Bergens Tidende & Ors. v. Norway
Country: NorwayYear: 2000
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Citation: App. No. 26132/95, 31 Eur. H.R. Rep. 16 (2001).
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Health information, Health systems and financing, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Freedom of expression, Right to due process/fair trial
A plastic surgeon, Dr R., brought defamation proceedings against a major Norwegian newspaper, Bergens Tidende, as well as against the newspaper’s former editor-in-chief and a journalist employed at the paper. Dr. R. claimed that the applicants had published a series of articles recounting complaints of dissatisfied patients that portrayed his care and follow-up treatment as …Read more
BT v. Oei
Country: AustraliaYear: 1999
Court: Supreme Court of New South Wales
Citation: [1999] NSWSC 1082
Health Topics: Controlled substances, Health care and health services, Health information, HIV/AIDS, Infectious diseases, Medical malpractice, Mental health, Sexual and reproductive health
The case was brought by BT on behalf of herself and on behalf of the estate of her late husband, AT, against the defendant, a general practitioner, who was AT’s doctor from 26 November 1991 to 22 January 1993. The case arose as a result of the defendant’s alleged negligent failure to diagnose AT’s HIV …Read more
Causey v. St. Francis Medical Center
Country: United StatesYear: 1998
Court: Court of Appeal of Louisiana
Citation: Causey v. St. Francis Medical Center 719 So. 2d 1072 (La. Ct. App. 1998)
Health Topics: Aging, Informed consent, Medical malpractice
Plaintiffs, the Causey family, brought this petition for damages against defendants, St. Francis Medical Center (SFMC) and Dr. Harter, for administering treatment to decedent, Sonya Causey, without consent which they argued as an intentional tort outside of the scope of Louisiana’s Medical Malpractice Act. Claims that fell within the Medical Malpractice Act must be submitted …Read more
Mrs. Shantha vs. State Of Andhra Pradesh and Ors
Country: IndiaYear: 1997
Court: High Court - Andhra Pradesh
Citation: 1999 ACJ 454; AIR 1998 AP 51; 1997 (4) ALT 357
Health Topics: Medical malpractice, Poverty
Human Rights: Right to health, Right to life
Mrs. Shantha, the Petitioner, was admitted to the Government Maternity Hospital for a caesarian section. She was affected sterilization after the caesarian section. On leaving the hospital after the operation, she felt abdominal discomfort leading to very severe pain. Following medical examination, it was discovered that surgical equipment had been left inside the Petitioner’s abdomen …Read more
A. & Ors. v. Denmark
Country: DenmarkYear: 1996
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Citation: App. No. 20826/92, 22 Eur. H.R. Rep. 458 (1996).
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Health systems and financing, HIV/AIDS, Hospitals, Infectious diseases, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Right to due process/fair trial
The applicants were Danish citizens infected with HIV through State administered blood transfusions, who filed a violation of Article 6 of the Convention (right to court) claim. Eight of the applicants were victims and two were relatives of victims, who through frequent blood transfusions at Danish Hospitals were infected with HIV. The eight applicants/victims joined …Read more
Diennet v. France
Country: FranceYear: 1995
Court: The European Court of Human Rights
Citation: Case number 25/1994/4/472/553
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Hospitals, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Right to due process/fair trial
The Regional Council of Medical Association struck the applicant off the register of practitioners on account of professional misconduct such as not examining the patients personally and not monitoring or adjusting the treatment. On appeal, the National Council modified the Regional Council’s order of striking off to disqualifying him from practicing medicine for three years. …Read more
Rizzo v. Schiller
Country: United StatesYear: 1994
Court: Rizzo v. Schiller 445 S.E. 2d 153 (Va. 1994)
Citation: Rizzo v. Schiller 445 S.E. 2d 153 (Va. 1994)
Health Topics: Child and adolescent health, Infectious diseases, Medical malpractice, Sexual and reproductive health
Human Rights: Right to health
Plaintiffs, Michael Sean Rizzo Sr. and Pamela Rizzo, filed this action against defendant physician Maurice Schiller, who they alleged breached the standard of care owed to them with his negligent and nonconsensual use of obstetrical forceps during Mrs. Rizzo’s delivery. Pamela Rizzo was admitted to Fairfax Hospital on November 7th at 9:00am in active labor. …Read more
Malette v. Shulman et al.
Country: CanadaYear: 1990
Court: Ontario Supreme Court, Court of Appeal
Citation: 67 DLR (4th) 321, 72 OR (2d) 417
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Informed consent, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Freedom of religion, Right to bodily integrity
Malette, a Jehovah’s Witness, sued Dr. Shulman for administering a blood transfusion contrary to her prior expressed wishes. Malette was rushed to the emergency room after sustaining serious injuries in a car accident. She was semi-conscious and bleeding profusely. One of the nurses found a card in her purse, which stated she was a devout …Read more