Case 42755708
Country: LatviaYear: 2010
Court: District Court of Administrative Cases
Citation: A02405-10/18
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Health systems and financing, Medicines
Human Rights: Right to health, Right to life
The Plaintiff bought 13 packs of Sprycel, also known as desatinib, during the year and sought reimbursement for their costs. A local university hospital doctors council concluded that the Plaintiff would not survive without Sprycel treatment. According to the law of Latvia, the Plaintiff was reimbursed up to LVL 10 000 for his purchase of …Read more
Case 857/B/2005 AB
Country: HungaryYear: 2010
Court: Constitutional Court
Health Topics: Aging, Health systems and financing
Human Rights: Right to health, Right to social security
Petitioner sought a declaration that a certain provision of a government decree regulating minimum pension amounts was unconstitutional because it (a) regulated a fundamental right which could only be done by statute and (b) provided a social security benefit too low to maintain human dignity, which was guaranteed by the Constitution.
Case AI 780709/RS
Country: BrazilYear: 2010
Court: Federal Supreme Court
Citation: AI 780709/RS, Supremo Tribunal Federal [Federal Supreme Court] (2010).
Health Topics: HIV/AIDS, Infectious diseases, Medicines, Poverty
Human Rights: Right to health, Right to life
The Court of Justice held the State of Rio Grande do Sul responsible for providing medicines free of charge to an individual living with HIV who was unable to afford them. The court based its decision on the rights to life and health. Considering these medications necessary for the survival of the individual, the court blocked …Read more
Eneh v. Holder
Country: United StatesYear: 2010
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Citation: 601 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 2010)
Health Topics: Chronic and noncommunicable diseases, Controlled substances, Health systems and financing, HIV/AIDS, Medicines, Prisons
Human Rights: Freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
The Petitioner, Lawrence Amaechi Eneh, was a native and citizen of Nigeria. He had contracted HIV while working in a nursing home in the United States. He was living with HIV-related illness, Capsis Sarcoma and Valley Fever, a disease of the lungs, at the time of the proceedings. The Petitioner was convicted for the sale …Read more
H.R. v. Försäkringskassan
Country: SwedenYear: 2010
Court: Supreme Administrative Court
Citation: RÅ 2010 ref. 52, Målnummer: 1201-09
Health Topics: Health systems and financing
Human Rights: Freedom of movement and residence, Right to health, Right to social security
H.R’s partner became acutely ill during her temporary residency in Great Britain. H.R. travelled to Great Britain to support and care for her whilst she was in hospital. He was the only family member present for multiple surgeries to treat his partner’s life-threatening cancer. This required significant and costly travel for H.R. Upon returning to …Read more
Ministry of Health v. Atkinson
Country: New ZealandYear: 2010
Court: High Court
Citation: [2010] NZHC 1216
Health Topics: Disabilities, Health care and health services, Health systems and financing
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination
In 2010, the New Zealand Human Rights Tribunal (the Tribunal) declared that the New Zealand government’s policy that excluded relatives of disabled persons from receiving public payments for providing home-care disability services (the Policy) was discriminatory and thus, violated s 19 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act (NZBoRA). The Tribunal’s declaration was challenged …Read more
Case 2009-166f
Country: BelgiumYear: 2009
Court: Constitutional Court [Court Constitutionelle]
Citation: C. C., n°2009-166f, 29 October 2009
Health Topics: Health systems and financing, Medicines
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination
The National Institute of Health and Disability Insurance (INAMI) sued the defendant company Aktuapharma for payment of fees. The defendant company was a parallel importer, importing pharmaceutical products from other countries to Belgium. A specific brand-name drug available in Belgium might be available in another country at a cheaper price. The defendant company would import …Read more
Municipality of Vitória, et al. v. Almeida, et al.
Country: BrazilYear: 2009
Court: Supremo Tribunal Federal [Federal Supreme Court]
Citation: Municipality of Vitória, et al. v. Almeida, et al.,RE 573061/ES, Supremo Tribunal Federal [Federal Supreme Court] (2009).
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Sexual and reproductive health
Human Rights: Right to health, Right to life
The Municipality of Vitoria, in the State of Espritio Santo, Brazil, and the Federal Government appealed to the Federal Supreme Court of Brazil – an extraordinary appeal – to have the decision of the lower court overruled. The lower court had decided in favor of Alessandro Dias Almeida and others that the State should provide …Read more
Case 1157/2007-II
Country: MexicoYear: 2008
Court: District Court of the State of Guerrero
Citation: Juzgado del Distrito de Guerrero [JD] [District Court of Guerrero], J.A.IA. 1157/2007-II (Mex.). (Mini Numa Community v. Secretary of Health, et al.)
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Health systems and financing, Hospitals, Medicines
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination, Right to health, Right to life, Right to social security
Mini Numa is an indigenous rural community located in the state of Guerrero, Mexico, composed of a population of 270 and whose closest medical center is four kilometers/one hour away in Metlatónoc, Guerrero. The regulations for the construction of a medical center in Guerrero required that the community hold at least 2500 to 3000 inhabitants …Read more
Case 649
Country: RomaniaYear: 2008
Court: National Council for Combating Discrimination
Citation: Decision No. 649 of 4 December 2008
Health Topics: Child and adolescent health, Health care and health services, Hospitals
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination, Right to health
The petitioner claimed that the defendant hospital’s practice of only admitting mothers with sick children was discriminatory. In particular, the petitioners pointed to the defendant hospital’s notice board which read: “children up to 3 years of age are admitted along with their mothers”, and “Mother – not relatives”. However, the defendant hospital argued that this …Read more